My chemistry publication says when work-related is excellent on the system, it is positive. When work is excellent by the system, it is negative.
You are watching: If a system does work is it negative or positive
My yellowcomic.com publication says the opposite. It says that when job-related is done on the system, it is negative. When job-related is excellent by the system, it is positive.
Why perform they differ?
It is simply a issue of convention. It have to be constant throughout.
Case 1: job-related done on the system is positive.
Here the very first law is created as $$ mathrmdU = mathrmdQ + mathrmdW ,. ag1$$
If your structure of referral is "system", then the work-related done top top the mechanism ($W$) is positive and also the heat that is included to the mechanism is likewise positive, which method the readjust in internal power is also positive by very first law the thermodynamics, which means that there is rise in temperature. This appeals to usual sense. Right here positive readjust in interior energy synchronizes to increase in temperature
Case 2: work done by the mechanism is positive
Here the an initial law is created as $$ mathrmdU = mathrmdQ - mathrmdW ,. ag2$$
If work-related is applied to the system, $mathrmdW$ term becomes negative making 2 negatives positive, i m sorry is identical to equation (1) and heat added to the device is still optimistic here. Rest of the disagreements follow as above.
enhance this price
edited Aug 12 "18 in ~ 11:39
91k2121 gold badges240240 silver badges392392 bronze badges
answer Sep 6 "13 at 21:51
37211 silver- badge77 bronze title
add a comment |
Taking that in a different sense: chemistry is bring away the technique that you want to create a brand-new configuration within the reaction courage (and input power like heat or such) and also the yellowcomic.com course publication is taking around letting the mechanism doing work (eg. Burn what is in the reaction vessel).
In both means entropy will certainly be at the very least equal or positive.
boost this price
answered Jul 28 "13 in ~ 6:04
3122 bronze badges
include a comment |
It"s just a convention in yellowcomic.com we are more interested in acquiring some work-related output speak a mechanical machine , engine etc while in chemistry we are much more concerned through the internal power things for this reason we do so in both the situations the result is exact same yellowcomic.com case : du = dq - dw , doing job-related on system increases internal power as dw = an adverse for work-related done top top system and vice versa
chemistry instance : du = dq + dw ; doing work on system will increase the internal power of the device as dw = hopeful which is obvious and also vice versa.
we have the right to take any sign convention in a offered problem yet we should be regular with that throughout the difficulty to prevent confusion and also mistake.
See more: Ask Farmer: What Is The C On Nfl Jerseys, Captain Stars On Nfl Football Jerseys
enhance this answer
edited Jun 3 "17 in ~ 3:19
answered Oct 9 "13 in ~ 10:48
gunjan parashargunjan parashar
12133 bronze title
include a comment |
Highly active question. Earn 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order come answer this question. The reputation requirement helps protect this concern from spam and non-answer activity.
Not the price you're looking for? Browse various other questions tagged thermodynamics work-related conventions or questioning your own question.
Featured on Meta
Is occupational done ~ above a system always the an unfavorable of the work done by the system?
Thermodynamics - authorize convention
Why is the sign of the formula because that calculating pillar work because that compressors, pumps and turbines positive?
classic Mechanics -- authorize of occupational done
an interpretation of work done by/on system and also heat absorbed/dissipated by mechanism
What is the definition of the sign of work-related done? does it influence internal energy also?
What is the an interpretation of "work done on or by" a gas?
What is the authorize convention being provided in thermodynamics because that calculating occupational done?
authorize of the job-related done through dissipation pressures
Why the work-related done is positive as soon as bringing 2 opposite dues together?
What's the justification because that the sign in the formula because that work?
hot Network inquiries an ext hot questions
i ordered it to RSS
concern feed To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader.
stack Exchange Network
site architecture / logo © 2021 ridge Exchange Inc; user contributions license is granted under cc by-sa. Rev2021.10.25.40561